Philosophers / Alasdair MacIntyre
Contemporary

Alasdair MacIntyre

1929 – ?
Glasgow, Scotland → Notre Dame, Indiana
Aristotelianism ethics political philosophy history of philosophy philosophy of social science philosophy of religion

Alasdair MacIntyre is a Scottish-American philosopher whose *After Virtue* issued one of the most powerful challenges to modern moral philosophy in the twentieth century. Drawing on Aristotle, Aquinas, and the concept of tradition-constituted rationality, MacIntyre argued that the Enlightenment project of grounding morality in universal reason had failed, leaving contemporary moral discourse in a state of confusion — a cacophony of incommensurable moral fragments inherited from incompatible traditions.

Key Ideas

After virtue, practice-tradition, narrative unity of life, emotivism critique, moral relativism

Key Contributions

  • Argued that the Enlightenment project of grounding morality in universal reason has failed, leaving modern moral discourse in a state of fragmentation
  • Revived virtue ethics as a serious philosophical program through the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition
  • Developed the concept of tradition-constituted rationality: standards of rationality are internal to traditions, but traditions can be rationally compared
  • Analyzed practices, narrative unity, and tradition as the three stages of virtue in a post-Enlightenment context
  • Challenged liberal individualism with a communitarian vision of moral life rooted in shared goods and practices

Core Questions

Why has modern moral philosophy failed to provide rational foundations for ethics?
Is morality intelligible outside the context of a tradition and a shared conception of the human good?
How can rival moral traditions be rationally compared if rationality itself is tradition-dependent?
What are the virtues, and how do they relate to practices, narrative, and tradition?
Is liberal individualism a coherent moral framework, or does it rely on fragments of incompatible traditions?

Key Claims

  • Modern moral discourse is in a state of disorder: we use fragments of moral vocabularies from incompatible traditions without recognizing their incommensurability
  • The Enlightenment project of justifying morality through universal reason independent of tradition was doomed to fail
  • The moral life is best understood through the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition of virtues: excellences needed for achieving goods internal to practices
  • Rationality is tradition-constituted: there are no tradition-independent standards of rational justification
  • Rival traditions can be rationally compared when one faces internal contradictions that another can resolve
  • Liberal individualism is not a neutral framework but a tradition with its own parochial assumptions about the self and the good

Biography

Early Life and Education

Alasdair Chalmers MacIntyre was born on January 12, 1929, in Glasgow, Scotland. He studied at Queen Mary College, London, and the University of Manchester, where he began his academic career. His early intellectual trajectory moved through Marxism (he was a member of the British Communist Party and later the International Socialists) and engagement with psychoanalysis before turning toward Aristotelianism and, eventually, Thomistic Catholicism.

Early Work and the Turn from Marxism

MacIntyre's early works — Marxism: An Interpretation (1953, later revised as Marxism and Christianity), The Unconscious (1958), and A Short History of Ethics (1966) — showed a thinker grappling with the foundations of moral and political thought. His growing dissatisfaction with Marxism's inability to provide an adequate moral psychology and his deepening engagement with the history of ethics led to the breakthrough of After Virtue.

After Virtue (1981)

MacIntyre's most famous work opens with a striking thought experiment: imagine a world in which science has been destroyed and fragments of scientific knowledge survive as disconnected pieces — used without understanding, cited in debates they no longer belong to. MacIntyre argues that this is precisely the state of moral discourse in modern liberal societies. We possess fragments of moral vocabularies inherited from Aristotelian, Christian, Kantian, and utilitarian traditions, but we have lost the coherent frameworks that once gave these concepts their meaning.

The Enlightenment project — the attempt to ground morality in universal reason, independent of tradition and particular conceptions of the good — was doomed to fail, because moral reasoning is intelligible only within the context of a tradition, a community, and a shared conception of the human good. MacIntyre's positive proposal was a return to the Aristotelian tradition of the virtues: the moral life is best understood as the cultivation of excellences (virtues) necessary for achieving the goods internal to practices, within the narrative unity of a human life, as part of a living tradition.

The book's famous closing image — "We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another — doubtless very different — St. Benedict" — called for the creation of new forms of community dedicated to the practice of the virtues in an age of moral fragmentation.

Whose Justice? Which Rationality? and Three Rival Versions

Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (1988) extended MacIntyre's argument by developing the concept of tradition-constituted rationality. Rationality is not universal or tradition-independent; rather, standards of rationality are internal to particular traditions of inquiry (Aristotelian, Augustinian, Humean, liberal). However, traditions can be rationally compared: a tradition that faces internal contradictions it cannot resolve on its own terms, but which can be resolved by the resources of a rival tradition, has rational grounds for recognizing the rival's superiority.

Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry (1990) staged a confrontation between encyclopedism (the Enlightenment project), genealogy (Nietzsche), and tradition (Thomistic Aristotelianism), arguing for the superiority of the Thomistic synthesis.

MacIntyre converted to Roman Catholicism in the 1980s. His later work, including Dependent Rational Animals (1999), emphasized the Thomistic-Aristotelian account of human nature as dependent, vulnerable, and social, arguing that the virtues of acknowledged dependence are as important as the virtues of independence.

He has held positions at Oxford, Boston University, Vanderbilt, and the University of Notre Dame.

Methods

historical-narrative method tradition-constituted inquiry virtue analysis comparative moral theory Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy

Notable Quotes

"{'text': 'We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another — doubtless very different — St. Benedict.', 'source': 'After Virtue', 'year': 1981}"
"{'text': "I can only answer the question 'What am I to do?' if I can answer the prior question 'Of what story or stories do I find myself a part?'", 'source': 'After Virtue', 'year': 1981}"
"{'text': 'The Enlightenment project of providing a rational vindication of morality had decisively failed.', 'source': 'After Virtue', 'year': 1981}"
"{'text': 'A practice involves standards of excellence and obedience to rules as well as the achievement of goods.', 'source': 'After Virtue', 'year': 1981}"

Major Works

  • A Short History of Ethics Book (1966)
  • After Virtue Book (1981)
  • Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Book (1988)
  • Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry Book (1990)
  • Dependent Rational Animals Book (1999)
  • Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity Book (2016)

Influenced by

Sources

  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • The Cambridge Companion to Alasdair MacIntyre (forthcoming)
  • Alasdair MacIntyre (D'Andrea, 2006)
  • After MacIntyre (Horton & Mendus, 1994)

External Links

Translations

Portuguese
100%
Spanish
100%
Italian
100%

Discussions

No discussions yet.

Compare:
Compare